I suffered those things back in the 70s and 80s.
When data folk started putting POS registers tied back to a central computer into old structures built in the 40s and 50s, they had a lot of trouble.
Many of the data paths used a ground return.
The data folk didn't realize that grounding was a work in progress in the years when the structures were built.
Many of the early grounding system had a tendency to lose continuity over the years. Armoured cable with aluminum armour was the worst.
It had a strong tendency to become a high resistance, high inductance path.
The data folk's solution?
Isolated ground plugs.
The reality was that by the time the isolated ground plugs arrived, grounding methods had improved to the point that a good code ground was as effective as an isolated ground.
We had a foreman with a talent for making a code ground look like an isolated ground.
As long as the data guy thought that he had an isolated ground it worked perfectly.
A typical conversation, after the installation of a code ground that looked like an isolated ground:
Our guy;
"How important is the isolated ground?"
Data guy;
"Oh, it's very important. I can tell that you have done a good job on this isolated ground by how well it's working."
Even as the isolated ground receptacles were coming on the market, the better equipment was no longer using the building grounding system as part of the data path.
I like your sum up:
" Mostly an overpriced product in search of a problem in most cases. "
Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter