Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Intrinsic safety "i" EN50020

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pedersen

Electrical
Dec 18, 2003
2
Does anyone have experience with faults in the European EN50020 Intrinsic safety "i" standard ?

I'm questioning the Minimum igniting voltages curve in figure A.3. Group II capacitive circuits, while I have found curves in UL1604 and BS5501 part 7 (which are applicable for Group IIC - hydrogen and acetylene), which are NOT identical to figure A.3. in EN50020 ?

This is not the case, while the specific curve in EN50020 is more restrictive - why ?

In my opinion the Minimum igniting voltages curves (applicable to group IIC - 22 percent hydrogen) should be the same if the circumstances are identical (mixture, spark test apparatus etc.) !

It would be nice with others opinion, but accepts the limited chance of a "hit".
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

pederson
I believe the readson for hydrogen and acetelyne to have tighter curves is due to the higher level of flamability.
What I mean by that is it takes a very small amount of energy to ignite a combustible mix cotaining these gases rather than say petrol vapours.

This is also reflected in th "T" ratings given to ex "d" & "i" devices cases

hope this helps
Don
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor