alienitmeca
Mechanical
- Feb 20, 2014
- 85
Dear fellow engineers,
I am working on a new bitument storage tank (net capacity of 400 cubic meter), a heating coil system should be implemented on the tank in order to maintain the bitument in a liquid form. The client asked for the tank to be insulated for energy concervation resons which make us and the client on the same page.
Having done some reaserch on bitumen storage tank, I have noticed that most of them tend to be with small diameter and considrable hight.
On the other hand, after doing some simple calculations, I found that the lower the tank is, the smaller the shell surface, which make the exchange surface smaller. Thus, it should be better to have tank big on the diameter, small on the hight.
Could you please confirme one configuration over the other. I would really apreciate it if you could provide me with the advantages and the disadvantages of both configurations.
Looking forward to receinving your responses. Your recommendations are all welcome.
Best Regards.
I am working on a new bitument storage tank (net capacity of 400 cubic meter), a heating coil system should be implemented on the tank in order to maintain the bitument in a liquid form. The client asked for the tank to be insulated for energy concervation resons which make us and the client on the same page.
Having done some reaserch on bitumen storage tank, I have noticed that most of them tend to be with small diameter and considrable hight.
On the other hand, after doing some simple calculations, I found that the lower the tank is, the smaller the shell surface, which make the exchange surface smaller. Thus, it should be better to have tank big on the diameter, small on the hight.
Could you please confirme one configuration over the other. I would really apreciate it if you could provide me with the advantages and the disadvantages of both configurations.
Looking forward to receinving your responses. Your recommendations are all welcome.
Best Regards.