I need to settle a little debate with my boss. Here's the situation:
Normally, the soils reports that we get from our geotechs instructs us to ignore the top 2 meters or so of the pile length when calculating skin friction and lateral load resistance.
By boss says that that the 2 meters is from the top of the pile cap, not the top of the pile itself. He is assuming that the issue is frost disturbance to the soil. Therefore the two meters is measured from the soil surface surrounding the pile/cap assembly.
I was under the impression that the two meters should be taken from the top of the pile which, in this case, is the bottom of the pile cap. I thought that it was all about the soil near the top of the pile being disturbed by construction activities associated with constructing the piles.
So, who's right here? For what it's worth, these are cast in place concrete piles.
Normally, the soils reports that we get from our geotechs instructs us to ignore the top 2 meters or so of the pile length when calculating skin friction and lateral load resistance.
By boss says that that the 2 meters is from the top of the pile cap, not the top of the pile itself. He is assuming that the issue is frost disturbance to the soil. Therefore the two meters is measured from the soil surface surrounding the pile/cap assembly.
I was under the impression that the two meters should be taken from the top of the pile which, in this case, is the bottom of the pile cap. I thought that it was all about the soil near the top of the pile being disturbed by construction activities associated with constructing the piles.
So, who's right here? For what it's worth, these are cast in place concrete piles.