Sofish
Civil/Environmental
- Dec 14, 2010
- 1
Hi All,
I'm designing a simply supported glulam for a pile cap soffit form. Glulam size is 10.75"x18" 24F-V8 1.8E, balanced layup. Each end is supported by a HSS4x4x0.375 with 3/4" dia coil rod hanger, (1) coil rod on either side of the glulam. This glulam hanger only provides vertical support and does not provide lateral support or rotational support.
Approach 1)
Since the d/b <2 for this glulam, no lateral stability support is required along the length plus rotation does not need to be prevented at these hanger supports. This approach assumes that you can apply stability requirements from 2018 NDS section 3.3.3.2 that allows use of alternative guidelines from section 4.4.1 (d/b <2 = no lateral bracing required). Section 3.3.3.2 states that it applies only to "sawn lumber", but article TT-085B by APA states that section 3.3.3.2 and 4.4.1 is applicable to glulams.
Approach 2)
On the other hand, going strictly by the language of section 3.3.3.2, you would not be able to use 4.4.1, since our circumstance is for a glulam and by section 3.3.4 --> d/b >1, therefore rotational prevention blocking is required over supports.
Can anyone speak from experience on if d/b <2 is applicable to glulams in eliminating the need for any kind of lateral or rotational bracing?
Thanks
I'm designing a simply supported glulam for a pile cap soffit form. Glulam size is 10.75"x18" 24F-V8 1.8E, balanced layup. Each end is supported by a HSS4x4x0.375 with 3/4" dia coil rod hanger, (1) coil rod on either side of the glulam. This glulam hanger only provides vertical support and does not provide lateral support or rotational support.
Approach 1)
Since the d/b <2 for this glulam, no lateral stability support is required along the length plus rotation does not need to be prevented at these hanger supports. This approach assumes that you can apply stability requirements from 2018 NDS section 3.3.3.2 that allows use of alternative guidelines from section 4.4.1 (d/b <2 = no lateral bracing required). Section 3.3.3.2 states that it applies only to "sawn lumber", but article TT-085B by APA states that section 3.3.3.2 and 4.4.1 is applicable to glulams.
Approach 2)
On the other hand, going strictly by the language of section 3.3.3.2, you would not be able to use 4.4.1, since our circumstance is for a glulam and by section 3.3.4 --> d/b >1, therefore rotational prevention blocking is required over supports.
Can anyone speak from experience on if d/b <2 is applicable to glulams in eliminating the need for any kind of lateral or rotational bracing?
Thanks