Nereth1
Mechanical
- Feb 2, 2014
- 136
Hi all,
I am by no means a materials scientist or materials engineer so I hope that this is not a silly question.
We are reverse engineering our own product, as the material (a glass filled HDPE) was blended in another country by a company that wouldn't give us much by way of datasheets.
The (presumably E-glass) fill in the HDPE was measured by burnout test to be 25.6%. This is the average of 5 total tests with results ranging from 23.6% to 26.1%.
The density of the complete composite was measured by gas pycnometer to be 1.245g/cm3.
The density of the HDPE fraction therefore comes out, theoretically, at 1.056g/cm3.
To my knowledge, raw HDPE only gets up to around 0.98g/cm3. I have been told that residual compressive strain from extruding the product could cause the higher density, and thus it is not unexpected. But that would be a hell of a lot of strain (keeping in mind the poisson's ratio would not allow volume to drop in direct proportion to strain), and I could not find any reference to how large such an effect could be when I searched for it. Does that sound like a reasonable explanation, or is something more unexpected going on?
I am by no means a materials scientist or materials engineer so I hope that this is not a silly question.
We are reverse engineering our own product, as the material (a glass filled HDPE) was blended in another country by a company that wouldn't give us much by way of datasheets.
The (presumably E-glass) fill in the HDPE was measured by burnout test to be 25.6%. This is the average of 5 total tests with results ranging from 23.6% to 26.1%.
The density of the complete composite was measured by gas pycnometer to be 1.245g/cm3.
The density of the HDPE fraction therefore comes out, theoretically, at 1.056g/cm3.
To my knowledge, raw HDPE only gets up to around 0.98g/cm3. I have been told that residual compressive strain from extruding the product could cause the higher density, and thus it is not unexpected. But that would be a hell of a lot of strain (keeping in mind the poisson's ratio would not allow volume to drop in direct proportion to strain), and I could not find any reference to how large such an effect could be when I searched for it. Does that sound like a reasonable explanation, or is something more unexpected going on?