boofi
Mechanical
- Apr 28, 2016
- 36
Hi y'all,
Yes, another question about throttling a gate valve. I know for typical applications throttling a gate valve is inadvisable. However, one of the managers at my site constantly requests that gate valves that are root valves to instrumentation (e.g. manual pressure gauges) are maintained at 90% closed. Cracked open, essentially. The reasoning is that if there is a leak at the instrument the valve can be closed quickly, minimizing exposure.
Would gate and seat erosion be a factor here? Is this some kind of industry accepted practice? I imagine the flow at the gate and under the gauge would be mostly stagnant, reducing risk of damage to the valve.
I mean I guess it's risky either way. If the gate is wide open and the threads leak, the operator would have to sit there and spin the handle while being exposed. OR if the valve was cracked open and the gate was damaged, the operator would be there messing with the valve trying to close it to no avail, and still being exposed.
Thanks in advance for the clarification.
Yes, another question about throttling a gate valve. I know for typical applications throttling a gate valve is inadvisable. However, one of the managers at my site constantly requests that gate valves that are root valves to instrumentation (e.g. manual pressure gauges) are maintained at 90% closed. Cracked open, essentially. The reasoning is that if there is a leak at the instrument the valve can be closed quickly, minimizing exposure.
Would gate and seat erosion be a factor here? Is this some kind of industry accepted practice? I imagine the flow at the gate and under the gauge would be mostly stagnant, reducing risk of damage to the valve.
I mean I guess it's risky either way. If the gate is wide open and the threads leak, the operator would have to sit there and spin the handle while being exposed. OR if the valve was cracked open and the gate was damaged, the operator would be there messing with the valve trying to close it to no avail, and still being exposed.
Thanks in advance for the clarification.