NoelBrainer
Chemical
What are the pros and cons to TEG contacting vs. mol sieves for installation offshore?
Any ideas will help.
Thanks
NoelBrainer
Any ideas will help.
Thanks
NoelBrainer
Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations TugboatEng on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Gas dehydration
- Thread starter NoelBrainer
- Start date
- Status
Well Mr. Brainer, I dont have any experience in offshore facilities, but I can tell you that it depends on the extent of dehydration that you want to obtain.
Usually, the mol sieves are the complement of the TEG Unit, in cryogenic processes.
I could not dare to propose only a molecular sieves process for an offshore plant. I would take in account the both of them, because of the low temperatures that the pipeline can reach underwater and could form hydrates into it.
I hope that it can help you.
Regards From Venezuela !!!
Usually, the mol sieves are the complement of the TEG Unit, in cryogenic processes.
I could not dare to propose only a molecular sieves process for an offshore plant. I would take in account the both of them, because of the low temperatures that the pipeline can reach underwater and could form hydrates into it.
I hope that it can help you.
Regards From Venezuela !!!
space, weight, power consumption, environmental emissions, chemical storage and handling, required dehydration performance, reliability, maintainability, life cycle cost. Some of the factors that need to be weighed up. If you got down to some specifics of your project, then we could be more specific in replying.
Steve Jones
Materials & Corrosion Engineer
Steve Jones
Materials & Corrosion Engineer
Montemayor
Chemical
Brainer:
First of all, there is nothing "sacred" about a process being off-shore. The process will operate in the same manner as if it were on-shore. Civil engineering, communications, Safety, physical layout, external corrosion, weather, and structural constraints may be factors off-shore, but there is no effect on the process. I have dehydrated gas using TEG on off-shore platforms in Lake Maracaibo as well as West Texas; the process is the 100% the same.
You seldom, if ever, compare a glycol dehydration unit with an adsorption unit. As a ChemEng you should already know that you have to identify your scope of work; what this means is that you have to consider what level of dehydration you intend or hope to achieve. The level of dehydration (& the size of the humid gas stream) is what determines whether you apply one of the other. There may be other process factors - especially economics - involved, but with the sparse amount of basic data you furnish we can't comment any further. If you want details, you have to furnish details beforehand especially basic data.
Glycol dehydration is normally employed to dry gas to positive dewpoints; adsorption - such as with Mol Sieves & Activated Alumina - can achieve dew points down to -150 oF. Additionally, adsorption is a batch-swing type of process, while glycol is a continuous, steady-steady state one. These are all important factors that any Chem Eng should already know and be prepared to take into consideration. The application and the basic data make all the difference on whether they apply or not.
Perhaps you can furnish specific basic data and scope of work information - at least more than one simple sentence. In that event, specifics can be addressed.
First of all, there is nothing "sacred" about a process being off-shore. The process will operate in the same manner as if it were on-shore. Civil engineering, communications, Safety, physical layout, external corrosion, weather, and structural constraints may be factors off-shore, but there is no effect on the process. I have dehydrated gas using TEG on off-shore platforms in Lake Maracaibo as well as West Texas; the process is the 100% the same.
You seldom, if ever, compare a glycol dehydration unit with an adsorption unit. As a ChemEng you should already know that you have to identify your scope of work; what this means is that you have to consider what level of dehydration you intend or hope to achieve. The level of dehydration (& the size of the humid gas stream) is what determines whether you apply one of the other. There may be other process factors - especially economics - involved, but with the sparse amount of basic data you furnish we can't comment any further. If you want details, you have to furnish details beforehand especially basic data.
Glycol dehydration is normally employed to dry gas to positive dewpoints; adsorption - such as with Mol Sieves & Activated Alumina - can achieve dew points down to -150 oF. Additionally, adsorption is a batch-swing type of process, while glycol is a continuous, steady-steady state one. These are all important factors that any Chem Eng should already know and be prepared to take into consideration. The application and the basic data make all the difference on whether they apply or not.
Perhaps you can furnish specific basic data and scope of work information - at least more than one simple sentence. In that event, specifics can be addressed.
- Thread starter
- #5
NoelBrainer
Chemical
Thanks to all. Your comments are right on. I am now realizizng that mol sieve is overkill when all I need is a 65°F dewpoint to avoid hydrates in the pipeline.
My gas stram is 0.65 SG saturated at 120 F and 1000 PSIG.
TEG is the optimum process.
Thanks Again.
Noel
My gas stram is 0.65 SG saturated at 120 F and 1000 PSIG.
TEG is the optimum process.
Thanks Again.
Noel
- Status
Similar threads
