Ihatelawyers
Geotechnical
- Dec 3, 2010
- 15
Reading ASTM E141 it seems to me that when evaluating existing fills the standard practices of our industry are falling short. E141 indicates that location of and evaluation of the units being examined (dry density of the engineered fill) should be performed in exactly the same way as done for the sample (i.e. nuc's or sand cones during construction). That is ... using SPT unit weights (or shelby, or whatever) to evaluate the relative compaction of an engineered fill is bunk. Am I reading E141 right? Seems like the degree of precision and accuracy needed for unit weight determination for geotechnical analysis would fall short of the accuracy and precision bar necessary for verification of an engineered fill.