Hi quark,
Thanks for the reference to McQuay's DuctSizer. I am not an HVAC person and I was not aware of this very useful tool. I downloaded it as I am always keen to test other tools against my own software. I ran a few examples and what I found was that although you and I came to the same answer, it was a coincindence and we were both wrong.
In my calculation I had assumed that the velocity head would be lost. This is wrong because it is discharging into an 18" WC system and the velocity head (velocity pressure in McQuay-speak) would be recovered. This means all 7" of available head can be used to overcome the pipe friction.
In your calculation you appear to have set the head loss to 7" per 100 ft, but Beazley's duct is only 60 ft long. When I set my software to allow recovery of velocity head and I set the pressure drop in DuctSizer to 11.667 inWC/100 ft then I get the same answer with both tools. The flowrate is now 7900 cfm. It seems that DuctSizer does not have an option to disallow velocity head recovery.
As you pointed out we have neglected entrance and fitting effects, so the actual flowrate would be a bit less than this.
DuctSizer does not have an input for pipe roughness. By trial and error in my software I adjusted the roughness until I got the same friction factor as DuctSizer. This occurs at a roughness of 0.00843 inch (0.214 mm) which seems like a perfectly reasonable (slightly conservative) number to me.
This exercise emphasizes the need for calcs to be checked. Years ago I had an engineer complain to me that he felt insulted because our company policy was for all calcs to be checked by a second engineer. I explained to him that it is an engineer's right to insist that his calculation be checked because society holds us engineers responsible for our work and the engineer is entitled to expect the company to protect him. Once he saw it from this point of view he was always happy to have his calcs checked, and I always like to have my calcs at least reviewed by someone I trust.
Anyway, I was happy to see DuctSizer confirm my software's results. Perhaps software also has the right to an independent check!