Contract textbooks recommend that clients retain the design engineers to execute a rigerous field observation program. They also provide indemnification language if the client chooses not to utilize such a program. What is your experience with field observation programs. Is this kind of program truely valuable to the client and engineer? Is their use widespread in the A&E industry? Would you recommend their use for small private clients on custom single family residence projects?
Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Field Observation Programs 2
- Thread starter digrazi
- Start date
-
2
- #2
As a structural engineer, we offer 2 levels of observation services on our projects.
The first one is typically included in the fee,(but still calculated into the hours on which the fee is based), and covers limited observations of field work to see that things are being carried out "in general conformance" with the design intent. Depending on project size and complexity, this typically involves 2-5 site visits during the construction phase.
The second one is often called "special inspection" in our area, and we consider the work as "additional services", and charge a separate fee. This requires being much more involved in the construction observation of our part of the project, e.g. counting reinforcing bars in footings and slabs, inspecting formwork for proper depth and clearances, watching concrete pours or grouting of masonry walls, etc.
Other engineers, such as Soils Engineers, typically ask for the second type of service on most of their jobs, because their recommendations depend highly on how the Contractor performs their work. In our case, we usually request that we perform it only on more complicated projects, where the potential for the Contractor to screw things up is higher.
My own opinion is that the level 2 type of service probably wouldn't be warranted on a residential type of job, (unless, of course, it was my house getting built).
The first one is typically included in the fee,(but still calculated into the hours on which the fee is based), and covers limited observations of field work to see that things are being carried out "in general conformance" with the design intent. Depending on project size and complexity, this typically involves 2-5 site visits during the construction phase.
The second one is often called "special inspection" in our area, and we consider the work as "additional services", and charge a separate fee. This requires being much more involved in the construction observation of our part of the project, e.g. counting reinforcing bars in footings and slabs, inspecting formwork for proper depth and clearances, watching concrete pours or grouting of masonry walls, etc.
Other engineers, such as Soils Engineers, typically ask for the second type of service on most of their jobs, because their recommendations depend highly on how the Contractor performs their work. In our case, we usually request that we perform it only on more complicated projects, where the potential for the Contractor to screw things up is higher.
My own opinion is that the level 2 type of service probably wouldn't be warranted on a residential type of job, (unless, of course, it was my house getting built).
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Question
- Locked
- Helpful tip
- Locked
- Question