NikonF6
Automotive
- Aug 21, 2013
- 165
If you are dooing FEA on assembly can you please point some major reasons why not to do it separately on parts instead
when doing assembly, i found that lnumber of parts should be limited to two (e.g. press fit and other contact stress on 2 surfaces)
In all of other case i try to stay away from assembly, the more parts the more errors.
Assembly contains numerous non-natural constraints that multiply error downstream.
On one part, using free-body diagram, i can always adjust and make-up for any expected irregularity, through load or constraints or material metalurgy non-consistancy.
Just one example is a problem with martensite structure only on the surface, which cannot be modeled on FEA, so it has to be compensated manually.
what are your oppinions?
when doing assembly, i found that lnumber of parts should be limited to two (e.g. press fit and other contact stress on 2 surfaces)
In all of other case i try to stay away from assembly, the more parts the more errors.
Assembly contains numerous non-natural constraints that multiply error downstream.
On one part, using free-body diagram, i can always adjust and make-up for any expected irregularity, through load or constraints or material metalurgy non-consistancy.
Just one example is a problem with martensite structure only on the surface, which cannot be modeled on FEA, so it has to be compensated manually.
what are your oppinions?