moltenmetal
Chemical
- Jun 5, 2003
- 5,504
Hi All- just wondering if anyone has documented experience, good bad or ugly, with ordinary (i.e. not trunnion type) 3-piece ball valves using 50% stainless steel or nickel powder-filled Teflon at temperatures above the normal upper service limit of reinforced Teflon, which I would put at around 232 C (450 F). Several valve manufacturers are selling these seats as a low torque alternative to PEEK for middle temperature applications, some stretching the service to 260 C (500F) and some stretching it even further to 550 F for low pressure services. Others are stretching similarly filled Teflon seat materials, where the filler is carbon or something other than glass. I'm suspicious...and the only people I have telling me that the valves are actually reliable at these operating fluid temperatures, aside from the people who wrote the datasheets of the valve manufacturers, are the salesmen.
What I'm interested in is services where the actual fluid temperature was consistently above 450 F, not services where the valve was used merely to stretch the design margin to a higher temperature. Service conditions (approximate) and fluid being handled would be of interest, as well as whether or not the valve was heat traced externally or just insulated.
What I'm interested in is services where the actual fluid temperature was consistently above 450 F, not services where the valve was used merely to stretch the design margin to a higher temperature. Service conditions (approximate) and fluid being handled would be of interest, as well as whether or not the valve was heat traced externally or just insulated.