Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Engineer of Record no longer employed with firm....
- Thread starter ToadJones
- Start date
The short answer is that, yes - another engineer can stamp the revision to a drawing.
One fact to note is that many states now require the engineer of record to observe construction of the design - if that engineer is no longer with the company, they can't be the one to make those observations. I would recommend you confirm what the requirements are for the state you're performing work in and ensure you (and your company) are maintaining compliance with the law governing PE seals. In some cases, a simple notification on the change in engineer performing the observation is acceptable - in other cases, the new engineer of record will need to re-stamp the applicable drawings to go on record as officially performing the observation.
One fact to note is that many states now require the engineer of record to observe construction of the design - if that engineer is no longer with the company, they can't be the one to make those observations. I would recommend you confirm what the requirements are for the state you're performing work in and ensure you (and your company) are maintaining compliance with the law governing PE seals. In some cases, a simple notification on the change in engineer performing the observation is acceptable - in other cases, the new engineer of record will need to re-stamp the applicable drawings to go on record as officially performing the observation.
One would think there would have to be some sort of protocol, given that an EOR could pass away, thereby requiring a new engineer to be able to take over.
TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! faq731-376 forum1529 Entire Forum list
TTFN (ta ta for now)
I can do absolutely anything. I'm an expert! faq731-376 forum1529 Entire Forum list
- Thread starter
- #4
msquared48
Structural
Hey Toad...
Good to hear from you again!
Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)
Good to hear from you again!
Mike McCann, PE, SE (WA)
- Thread starter
- #7
bridgebuster
Active member
In NY, on our state and local DOT projects, another engineer can alter a drawing BUT he/she has to stamp it and annotate it. Also, the original engineer's stamp must be present.
To quote the Hawaii Administrative Rule 16-115:
""Observation of construction" means making and documenting visits to the site by a licensed engineer, architect, landscape architect, or qualified representatives working under the supervision of a licensed engineer, architect, or landscape architect, as the case may require, to observe the progress and quality of the executed work and to determine, in general, if the work is proceeding in accordance with the contract documents. It is not required that they make exhaustive or continuous on-site observations to check the quality or quantity of work nor is it intended that the engineer, architect, or landscape architect be responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work."
No continuous presence required - additionally, as stated above, allowance is made for "qualified representatives" under the supervision of the PE to make the necessary construction observations, as well. No criteria is given for what makes someone qualified - so that responsibility seems to rest on the PE in charge of the observation.
""Observation of construction" means making and documenting visits to the site by a licensed engineer, architect, landscape architect, or qualified representatives working under the supervision of a licensed engineer, architect, or landscape architect, as the case may require, to observe the progress and quality of the executed work and to determine, in general, if the work is proceeding in accordance with the contract documents. It is not required that they make exhaustive or continuous on-site observations to check the quality or quantity of work nor is it intended that the engineer, architect, or landscape architect be responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures, or for safety precautions and programs in connection with the work."
No continuous presence required - additionally, as stated above, allowance is made for "qualified representatives" under the supervision of the PE to make the necessary construction observations, as well. No criteria is given for what makes someone qualified - so that responsibility seems to rest on the PE in charge of the observation.
In Texas the ultimate liability for the design lies with the firm. If an EOR leaves the firm and changes are made to the plans the original engineer's seal must be removed and a new EOR employed by the firm must seal and take responsible charge for anything on the sheet, not just the changes.
WARose, in Hawaii the general approach is that they want the EOR a little more involved during construction than seems to be typical on the mainland outside of some high seismic/wind requirements. Doesn't need to be continuous but seems like a fair amount of the mainland work I've seen and been involved with had engineers pretty well butt out during construction. EOR will respond to submittal reviews and RFIs and maybe make a site visit or two but otherwise contractor is out doing their own thing.
The way we've approached it with our Hawaii work is to actually go out to job sites a little more often and generally be more available to contractor than seems to be the norm elsewhere to help address unforeseen or unique conditions, identify and mitigate deficiencies, etc. Instead of contractor feeling like they're out building on their own, we try to provide support so they actually ask questions and bring up issues instead of just winging it (though some are stubborn and still just wing it).
I think most engineers and contractors would agree that having EOR more involved during construction is probably beneficial, main issue is getting owners to buy in and actually pay for it. To avoid that issue, Hawaii takes it out of owners' hands and just requires it.
The way we've approached it with our Hawaii work is to actually go out to job sites a little more often and generally be more available to contractor than seems to be the norm elsewhere to help address unforeseen or unique conditions, identify and mitigate deficiencies, etc. Instead of contractor feeling like they're out building on their own, we try to provide support so they actually ask questions and bring up issues instead of just winging it (though some are stubborn and still just wing it).
I think most engineers and contractors would agree that having EOR more involved during construction is probably beneficial, main issue is getting owners to buy in and actually pay for it. To avoid that issue, Hawaii takes it out of owners' hands and just requires it.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Question
- Locked
- Question
- Locked
- Question
