kapilgupt - Since jdonville has answered your question, I'll offer a few comments as a (former) Contractor who drove piling.
Elastic shortening is important on test piling where movement in measured in hundredths of an inch and the applied load is (intentionally) very high. It is less important when looking at a "production" pile group (I assume this is the same project that you are discussing here thread256-135311).
The service load (maybe 100 to 150 kips?), not the 600 kip ultimate load, is what the "production" piles will experience.
In a properly designed pile group the loading is concentric to the group; there should be no differential settlement (all of the pile deflect the same amount). The consequence being that some piles will carry more load than others - one reason (of several) for the relatively large safety factors used in pile driving.
In dense sand, the displacement piles you describe almost certainly develop significant skin friction (probably within the first 20 feet, or so).
Suggest that you visit my website (link below) and take a look at Section 15, "Interpretation of Load Tests", last paragraph on page 55, of "Bethlehem Steel H Piles". (I know that you are working with concrete piles, but in this case, issues discussed about steel pile are even more true for concrete pile).
In any event, (in a production pile group) the differential elastic shortening of a 70 ft. pile compared to a 100 ft. pile would be "lost in the noise" of all the other factors that are happening between soil directly under the pile tip and the applied load location. I agree that elastic shortening should be investigated, just be careful consider other factors too.
Best Wishes
![[reading] [reading] [reading]](/data/assets/smilies/reading.gif)