LTTANG
Structural
- Nov 25, 2010
- 4
In many design examples from the ACI318 Design Handbook (for footing strength design for Vu, Mu), the values of W or E is given in terms of a concentrically load P and subsequent q is derived (with proper load combinations) yielding a simple q=P/A. This q is then used to evaluate Vu and Mu and subsequent As and Av.
My question is how can I derive the q in these terms when I have an overturning moment at the footing and essentially an eccentric P? In some cases, applying 0.9D+E or 0.9D+1.6W, yields 'e' larger than the width of the footing (far beyond B/2) and yet q < Q allowable when evaluating stability of footing.
Should I just give up trying to figure out what q is and use whatever allowable Q given by the soil engineer or by code since it’s a sin to go beyond the Q.
I’d greatly appreciate your thoughts.
My question is how can I derive the q in these terms when I have an overturning moment at the footing and essentially an eccentric P? In some cases, applying 0.9D+E or 0.9D+1.6W, yields 'e' larger than the width of the footing (far beyond B/2) and yet q < Q allowable when evaluating stability of footing.
Should I just give up trying to figure out what q is and use whatever allowable Q given by the soil engineer or by code since it’s a sin to go beyond the Q.
I’d greatly appreciate your thoughts.