MDS N SONS
Industrial
- Dec 8, 2017
- 7
We are fabricating a pressure vessel to Section VIII Div 1 which will have a dimple jacket. We plan to proof test per UG-101(m). It will be an embossed plate, plug welded to a plain plate. Welds are being looked at per UW-19(c)and the plain plate as a stayed surface per UG-47. We will calculate the required burst pressure per UG-101(m)(2)(-a)adjusted per UG-101(k) for max temp, to obtain the 150 PSI MAWP we need.
My question is the size of the sample for the proof test. 17-7 states not less than 5 pitches an 24" x 24", but 17-7 is concerning welding qualifications. 17-5 sends you to UG-101 but mentions the test may be part of the test in 17-7.
UG-101(m) mentions a full size sample. We are struggling with UG-101(d) which allows the proof test of similar geometry to be used. Is the 24" x 24" sample enough for the proof test if we maintain the same material specs, thicknesses and dimple spacing? If so would the proof test sample need to be rolled to the same radius as the vessel or can it be flat? Thanks in advance.
My question is the size of the sample for the proof test. 17-7 states not less than 5 pitches an 24" x 24", but 17-7 is concerning welding qualifications. 17-5 sends you to UG-101 but mentions the test may be part of the test in 17-7.
UG-101(m) mentions a full size sample. We are struggling with UG-101(d) which allows the proof test of similar geometry to be used. Is the 24" x 24" sample enough for the proof test if we maintain the same material specs, thicknesses and dimple spacing? If so would the proof test sample need to be rolled to the same radius as the vessel or can it be flat? Thanks in advance.