nkumarp
Electrical
- Feb 1, 2002
- 4
We are facing problems in deciding on an optimum neutral earthing scheme for any typical industrial plant at 11 kV and at 415 V operating with their respective motors and genenerators.
The practices here are different in different regions. The British prefer a low resistance earth based on a premise that sufficient EF current flows to enable protection to clear the fault quickly, with the current limited to a level that would not pose rotation equipment core melt down ( i.e curents of 400 A to 1000 A cleared instantaneously)
The American & French prefer high or unearthed system with motor/generator core melt down prevention being more dominating factor at the expense of fault clearance and voltage rise posing insulation problems.
Has any one of you conducted a study comparing the schemes with clear recommendation on the best practice as well as a cost study since unearth system leads to additional cost in higher insulation requirement and down times as far as fault location is concerned
The practices here are different in different regions. The British prefer a low resistance earth based on a premise that sufficient EF current flows to enable protection to clear the fault quickly, with the current limited to a level that would not pose rotation equipment core melt down ( i.e curents of 400 A to 1000 A cleared instantaneously)
The American & French prefer high or unearthed system with motor/generator core melt down prevention being more dominating factor at the expense of fault clearance and voltage rise posing insulation problems.
Has any one of you conducted a study comparing the schemes with clear recommendation on the best practice as well as a cost study since unearth system leads to additional cost in higher insulation requirement and down times as far as fault location is concerned