Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Difference between tow types of definition of rigid diaphragm

Status
Not open for further replies.

Albertcnzheng

Civil/Environmental
Joined
Jan 9, 2003
Messages
1
Location
CN
I want to define floor in rigid diphragm.
First, I define the area element as rigid diphragm.Period is 2.86s
Secondly, I define the joint(point element) as rigid diphragm,period is 1.95.
I don't know why? Are there some differences between these tow types of definition?
 
Albertcnzheng:

In ETABS there is no need to define a master joint since it does the job of converting loads and self weights to masses automatically. If you wish to use rigid diaphragms, wich by the way is no longer necessary, all you have to do is select all the different areas in a story and assign them rigid diaphragm property.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top