Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Concrete Design - Alternating Live Loads

Status
Not open for further replies.

JAE

Structural
Jun 27, 2000
15,591
Is there any way in RISA Floor to alternate live loads (to meet ACI requirements) for concrete design?

In typical designs we would have six live load combinations:
Live Load on Odd Spans
Live Load on Even Spans
Live load on Adjacent spans 1-2, 4-5, 7-8, etc.
Live load on Adjacent spans 2-3, 5-6, 8-9, etc.
Live load on Adjacent spans 1, 3-4, 6-7, etc.
Total Live Load

This is required by the ACI code - you cannot ignore it. If you can't do this in RISA Floor then the concrete design package isn't any use.

??


 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

There are ways to do this, but they are not automated.... nor are they perfect solutions. Essentially this would have to be done "manually".

What you would do is define a different type of live load for those adjacent bays. Floor offers a number of types of live load (LL, LLS, RL, RLL, SL). You even have OL1 through OL4. Then you can create different load combinations to address the various different live load placement scenarios.

The program certainly was built around the concept of steel structures. When we added in concrete to the program we did so by merely adding a new member type into the existing design routine. Our thought was that there are a lot of multi-use buildings with some lower concrete levels, but with the upper levels mainly steel. RISAFloor will do a much better job on these buildings than other programs (IMHO). But, if you are doing a pure concrete building then this may not be the program for you.
 
Josh:

As good as RISA is, I am absolutely floored that it was not designed for this scenario (no pun intended, but I can live with it).

Sounds like suggestion time...


Mike McCann
MMC Engineering

 
This scenario doesn't come into play much for steel structures. And, RISAFloor was first designed for steel structures. So, any limitations related to concrete stem from that original program architecture.

At some point, we will re-vamp the program's concrete capabilities to handle this and other concrete specific issues. But, that's not necessarily as easy as it sounds. Some portions of the concrete code seem to be built around approximate hand calculation methods that are difficult to extend out into 3D finite element solutions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor