Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Composite floor plan 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

shin25

Structural
Jul 4, 2007
430
Attached is a part of a composite floor plan. The particular span is about 27' long. I am trying to evaluate the load carrying capacity of this span.

Reading the plans, I see, beside beam designations few more numbers- (14) and V25 (I have clouded the numbers). I presume, 14 is the total number of studs and V25 is the end reaction. but, seems that the total number of studs is awefully less for a full composite action. Can anyone confirm?

thanks in advance.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

See sheet S2.G1 for plan notes. Hopefully a legend will also be there.
 
I do not have access to this drawing. Any other thoughts?
 
It must be the number of studs. How many inches of concrete is it?

Never, but never question engineer's judgement
 
its, 3 1/2" LWC over 2"-18 gage metal deck. That is total 5 1/2" thick floor.
 
What is the deck composed of? (Deck height, concrete thhickness)?

Composite beams are routinely designed for less than 100% composite action. 25% is the minimum, but there is no requirement to go to 100% of composite action.

Assuming the 'V' number is the shear, you have approximately 1.85 kip/ft of load (50k total reaction/27 long).

For kicks I ran the problem assuming 3" deck with 3" concrete (6" total thhickness) and 850 PLF dead load and 1 K/ft LL, and lo and behold, I get a W16x26 with 14 - 3/4 dia x 5" studs. This assumes 50 ksi steel in the beam.

So, it may be fairly reasonably depending on the deck size and concrete cover.

May have made a mistake, as I went threough this fairly quickly, but off the top, it does not seem unreasonable.

 
Your post with the deck section came through as I was typing my response above.

If the concrete fill is lightweight, then yes, the stud # does look suspiciously low. I would get 22 studs with the deck configuration you list above, and the rest of my assumptions shown above.
 
Thanks Ikj. I think, the number of studs are even less to resist the uplift of the deck. The ribs are perpendicular to span.
 
I roughed some numbers out and it appears that it was designed for partial composite action which is not at all unusual for commercial construction. We do this all the time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor