QUINNCHEM:
I've used both. Since this is only conceptual, consider the following:
1. Concrete's fire resistance is countered by its inherently weak tensile strength -it practically has none. You have to employ it reinforced with rebar. Otherwise, any lateral force or blow would bring the pipe racks down on your head.
2. Since you have to add steel, isn't this approaching the same thing as H-beams coated with concrete for fire resistance? ---except that the reinforced concrete requires more labor and time. Plus, you can't weld or retrofit onto the concrete design; what you build is pretty well what you have to stay with.
3. When you say "beter" what exactly do you mean? Better is not an engineering term unless it is qualified. Do you mean economically? Safety wise? Operational wise? More practical? If your you or your relatives own a concrete plant, I guess that would be "better" also - right?
As I've said, I've employed concrete pipe supports - in overseas installations where labor was relatively cheap. I inherited them in existing plants and I found them to be deficient in design and lacking in flexibility. I've never proposed them in plants I've designed.