ohiowater
Civil/Environmental
- Jan 2, 2003
- 17
I am trying to gather a reasonable engineering explanation as to what truly dictates the use of carrier/feed water in chemical feed applications at Water Treatment Plants. This really seems to be somewhat indiscriminant amongst engineers.
Is the basis:
- Distance to the chemical feed point from the metering pump?
- The type of chemical being fed?
- The quantity of chemical being fed?
I have heard some clients and engineers say the use of carrier is simply a judgement call. I have heard some say provide carrier water for every chemical regardless of the constraints/applications. I have never heard or read any specific engineering feedback when to use, why, and how to size.
For example......
- Is 1/2" water connection always enough or is too much, this seems to be a common size.
- Should the carrier water always be sofetened or just with select chemicals that tend to scale or crystallize such as Sodium Hydroxide? Others?
Any engineerinhg feedback, references or resources would be greatly appreciated.
Is the basis:
- Distance to the chemical feed point from the metering pump?
- The type of chemical being fed?
- The quantity of chemical being fed?
I have heard some clients and engineers say the use of carrier is simply a judgement call. I have heard some say provide carrier water for every chemical regardless of the constraints/applications. I have never heard or read any specific engineering feedback when to use, why, and how to size.
For example......
- Is 1/2" water connection always enough or is too much, this seems to be a common size.
- Should the carrier water always be sofetened or just with select chemicals that tend to scale or crystallize such as Sodium Hydroxide? Others?
Any engineerinhg feedback, references or resources would be greatly appreciated.