Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Register Log in
  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Camber change and dynamic trail

Status
Not open for further replies.
frips

frips

Automotive
Oct 12, 2012
2
I have a quick enquiry about drawing the front suspension of a vehicle

When considering the centreline of a wheel to calculate scrub radii and track width, is camber ignored as per the second picture? Or is the center of the actual contact patch the more important dimension? I understand that the shape and position of the contact patch is significant when considering dynamic trail and steering feedback.

contactpatch.png


I imagine that a picture is worth more than a thousand forum posts.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Sort by date Sort by votes
The usual construction is that the CP location is at the point where the ideal wheel disc hits the ground. As you say, that is not really the effective point of application of the tire forces. I think that's why production cars have scrub radii of more than 10mm or less than -10 mm, so that at least the sign of the torque produced by Fx doesn't change. If you happen to have a plot of Fx and Mz in a braking test then that would be very interesting, it is not data I routinely see. It may be possible to back it out of a proper carpet plot.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You should take into consideration the Mx properties of the tire, especially if the vehicle has a high torque, high horsepower motor. Otherwise, you can get into some steering wheel kick situations during full power launch. I've direct experience with 3 brands/constructions of tires with +-20mm of pneumatic scrub (a tire's dynamic scrub radius contribution). If the tire has a positive component, it will effectively cancel out a good portion of the geometric negative term. Calculate Mx/Fz at slip and camber angles in driving and cornering inputs to directly see the magnitude of this 'issue'.

Mx is an often ignored tire property that is quite important during large Ax and Ay maneuvers.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Oh I see I was confused by "Mx/Fz", thats right, the pneumatic scrub radius.

I hadn't realised it could be as much as 20mm.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

ksw100
  • Locked
  • Question
Tire performance versus lateral load and camber. 1
Replies
2
Views
1K
cibachrome
cibachrome
GregLocock
  • Locked
  • News
Active Toe and Camber prototype
Replies
5
Views
562
cibachrome
cibachrome
alok_singh
  • Locked
  • Question
K&c test lateral loading trail value
Replies
7
Views
876
GregLocock
GregLocock
ksw100
  • Locked
  • Question
Chassis Stiffness and Suspension Tuning for Track Cars (i.e. Miata, Cayman, 911)
Replies
1
Views
1K
cibachrome
cibachrome
ksw100
  • Locked
  • Question
Design Criteria for Maximum Vertical and Lateral Impact Loads on Suspension Components
Replies
2
Views
1K
GregLocock
GregLocock

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top Bottom