Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

C88 Soundness of FA

Status
Not open for further replies.

fergie1133

Geotechnical
Jun 10, 2011
4
Hi,
I am researching a non-conformity from a recent fine aggregate proficiency sample. My lab has been getting a consistently higher %loss for the past 4 years (multiple technicians, virtually the same equipment). We only do this test once a year when we participate in the proficiency testing program.

Using magnesium sulfate (from the grocery store) to make the solution
Checking the SpG of the solution using a 100ml beaker and weighing it
Temperature of solution is maintained within the prescribed range
Sample fractions are held in #80 sieves, nested during soaking
Dried completely before the next soak
Nested sieves are washed with warm water after final drying period
Sieved over the same sieves at the end to determine %loss

I don't think that any of the sample is physically being lost out of the containers, I did wonder about the amount of free crystals in the solution but can't get the SpG high enough without them. Does anyone have experience with this test? Is there a variable I'm not thinking of?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Instead of using generic Epsom Salt, do a comparison with reagent grade magnesium sulphate. The grocery store variety is likely more variable
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor