Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

buoyancy design

Status
Not open for further replies.

jdbpe

Structural
Aug 4, 2005
28
Buoyancy design for structure with conventional steel columns and rigid mat foundation. What safety factor for buoyancy design is required? To resist buoyancy forces, can floor live loads above be used or only dead load?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

We use buoyancy factor of safety of 1.5.

Don't usually use live loads at all unless there is some assurance that part of the live load will definitely be there all the time....That usually makes it into a dead load.
 
I agree with JAE that live loads should not be used for resisting flotation loads.

In the UK we use a MINIMUM factor of safety of 1.1 against flotation based on the highest credible water level around the structure (more often 1.2 is used). The reason for the low FoS is based on the fact that you know EXACTLY what the uplift force due to water load is. Andy Machon


 
Andy: that makes sense....the 1.5 factor was just out of my head related to the 1.5 SF against overturning. But you're right...the buoyancy is quite well defined.
 
I have used a S.F. of 1.2 for foundations supporting non-building type structures (i.e., foundations for tanks, silos, transformers, etc.) and 1.5 up to 2.0 for foundations supporting buildings.

The following safety factors are recommended by "Duncan" in his foundation design book:

"S.F.=2.0 for basements and other parts of buildings subject to severe damage due to uplift"

"S.F.=1.5 for underground tanks and vaults not structurally connected to the building proper"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor