Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Branch connectio welding

Status
Not open for further replies.

lganga

Mechanical
Apr 10, 2011
109
Pepole

We are welding a 48" pipe for cooling water system. We have branches of 14 and 16" without reinforcement. We dont have a weld joint design. Do we have to weld it set in or set on?-

Regards
Luis
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

It may depend on the Code you are complying with.

ASME B31.3 allows either set-in or set-on as defined in section 328.4.3.2.c and in Fig 328.4.4. That said, most diagrams in B31.3 show set-on, so maybe it's preferred. IMHO technically neither is better than the other.
 
Set-on may have some advantages over set-in, like there's no root weld penetrating into the header. When the branch is small, you can easily (visually) check the root weld for a set-on. Welding positions may be different and preferable for one case over the other.
Then again, set-in might have advantages over set-on, but Im not aware of any at the moment
 
C2it
Is not my case but may be in more critical service, the set-on is objectable. My question was about the reinforcement area that you have with set-on compare to set- in. Indeed weld productivity is higher with set-on design.
Sorry the code is ASME ANSI B31.3
Regards
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor