Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Bearing Capacity - Rock

Status
Not open for further replies.

ONENGINEER

Geotechnical
Oct 13, 2011
284
I am designing a foundation on rock with a UCS = 50 MPa.

The RQD is about 55% and RMR is about 30. When I refer to Bienawski Table for Rock Classification it gives:
C = 150 kPa
Phi = 20 deg

for the rock mass. These give an allowable bearing capacity of 200 kPa.

When I refer to Goodman Rock Mechanics book, it suggests:

C = 0.25 (UCS) = 12.5 MPa
phi = 30 deg

for the rock mass. These give an allowable bearing capacity of 5000 kPa.

I cannot understand why the results are so much different.

It would be appreciated if you let me know where is the problem. Thank you.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Corrections:

I am designing a foundation on rock with a UCS = 50 MPa.

The RQD is about 55% and RMR is about 30. When I refer to Bienawski Table for Rock Classification it gives:
C = 150 kPa
Phi = 20 deg

for the rock mass. These give an allowable bearing capacity of 1100 kPa.

When I refer to Goodman Rock Mechanics book, it suggests:

C = 0.25 (UCS) = 12.5 MPa
phi = 30 deg

for the rock mass. These give an allowable bearing capacity of 2500 kPa.

I cannot understand why the results are so much different.

It would be appreciated if you let me know where is the problem. Thank you.
 
Check out Tomlinson's Foundation Design and Construction book - good presentation. Rock is sometimes a very strange bedfellow for something one thinks is cake.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor