BAGW
Structural
- Jul 15, 2015
- 392
Hi,
I have a question regarding multi-tier SCBF. I am designing a storage building 200’ in SDC D region. The building is regular in plan and area inside the building is all open. The framing I have is just perimeter framing and roof framing. The roof is a simple truss system. There are no other floor levels except the roof. The braces are on the perimeter in both directions. 200’ building is divided into five tiers so that I will have beams at every 40’ along the entire perimeter which helps in reducing the column unbraced length and I can have multi-tier X brace. Brace frames into the beam column intersection at every tier.
My question is do I have to design the beams based on ‘mechanism Analysis’? These are not really beams, they are more like struts. They don’t support any gravity loads. I am planning to design these members for over-strength combination rather than ‘Mechanism Analysis’. This ensures that the weak point is still in the brace.
Does anyone see any issue with this approach?
Thanks
I have a question regarding multi-tier SCBF. I am designing a storage building 200’ in SDC D region. The building is regular in plan and area inside the building is all open. The framing I have is just perimeter framing and roof framing. The roof is a simple truss system. There are no other floor levels except the roof. The braces are on the perimeter in both directions. 200’ building is divided into five tiers so that I will have beams at every 40’ along the entire perimeter which helps in reducing the column unbraced length and I can have multi-tier X brace. Brace frames into the beam column intersection at every tier.
My question is do I have to design the beams based on ‘mechanism Analysis’? These are not really beams, they are more like struts. They don’t support any gravity loads. I am planning to design these members for over-strength combination rather than ‘Mechanism Analysis’. This ensures that the weak point is still in the brace.
Does anyone see any issue with this approach?
Thanks