calculor
Structural
- Apr 13, 2001
- 59
Approximately 4 months ago we prepared a WPDS for replacement of a stainless overlay on a turbine shaft which consisted of 1035 mild steel. Based on Lincon's recommendation we used a 410 stainless steel. The shaft was machined to remove the existing overlay and an MPI was completed to indentify any cracking or inclusions. The procedure required preheating the base to approximately 500F and the overlay was applied about the circumference of the shaft using SAW method, the overlay is between .5" to .75" thick. The firm that completed the work did not compile any QA reports noting interpass temperature, electrode speed etc. The overlay was completed approximately a month and half ago and recently the shaft was delivered to the site and partially installed in the vertical direction.Approximately 3 days ago a crack was observed in the overlay, the crack was approximately .25" thk and extended the full length of the overlay on the shaft. Has anybody encountered a situation similar to this? Does anybody know why this crack may have occurred at this point in time? If this crack was attributed to residual stress would we not have seen the crack within 2-3 days after completion of the procedure? Incidently the fabricator insists he has followed the WPDS to the letter.Appreciate any information.