Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations JAE on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

ASTM E8

Status
Not open for further replies.

CCross

Aerospace
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
2
Location
US
ASTM E8, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, Paragraph 6.6.2.1, Full Cross Section, states that For material not exceeding 5mm in diameter...the cross-sectional area may be reduced to not less than 90% of the original area without changing the shape of the cross section.

I am looking for some clarification on this paragraph. Does this paragraph intended to convey that if a test specimens cross sectional area is reduced to not less than 90% of the original area, no matter what the resulting shape is, that it can be assumed that the original area has not changed; or does this mean that while reducing the cross sectional area to not less than 90% you can also not change the shaped of the specimen?

Thanks for your input!
 
It means the latter-- round cross-sections stay round after machining/sanding/etc. The cross-section should be measured after this procedure so that you have the correct value for calculation of strength.
 
So is there any standard for say run out when a circular sample is reduced in order to ensure that the round sample stayed round? I do not believe that someone with sand paper will be able to perfectly, within say .0001 or less of an inch, reduce a round sample diameter, but the ASTM does state that abrasive cloth or paper can be used so I would imagine their intent was to allow for "hand" reduction of the sample.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top