Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

ASME standard for dimensioning cut tubing

Status
Not open for further replies.

blitz97

Mechanical
Apr 25, 2007
79
Is there a place int he ASME standard that specifies how to dimension a stock tube cut to length with an angle on the end. I am getting different interpretations on dwgs I am seeing.

Options:

1)Overall length and an angle
2)Length on each side of the tube
3)something else

Thanks
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

awidrig,

I am not aware of a specific ASME procedure for dimensioning cut tubes. Overall length and angle, and length on each side of the tube are interpretable by ASME Y14.5M-1994. I, personally, would prefer overall length and an angle.

Is this process tubing, or are these precision machined parts?

If this is a precision machined part, your overall length with a ± tolerance, is ambiguous. The machinist is going to take the sharp edge off, and this will affect your as-measured length. If your length and angle are basic dimensions, you can apply profile and angle tolerances to the angled face. This makes for a precise definition of your tube end.

Critter.gif
JHG
 
Drawoh:
Where are you envisioning the basic length dimension of the tube to terminate? At the OAL of the tube? At the center of the angle (centerline of the tube)?
 
CheckerRon,

I have designed and drawn up a number of 45[°] mirror mounts, which present the precise dimensioning problem described above (by me, if not by the OP).

I show the height to the top, sharp corner. It has never occured to me to dimension to the centre. The maximum height is more useful to a machinist. The centre height requirement is to the top face of the optic, and is shown elsewhere in my documentation. A sloppy diameter does affect the position of the angled face.

On occasion, I have drawn phantom lines off to the side, and applied a basic dimension to the vertex.

However you do it, the feature is not directly measurable. You have to specify a basic dimension, and attach an FCF to the angled face.

My drawings are to a large enough scale that there is no confusion about what I am dimensioning to. I do not see a way around this. If you want to do single-line tubing isometrics, you are going to have to cut your tubes off straight.

Critter.gif
JHG
 
drawoh:
Actually I would dimension it to the OAL the same as you, and not to the centreline of the tube, but the question popped in my mind as I read your third paragraph.

I'm not sure why (in retrospect) since you did say straightaway that you preferred overall length and angle.

I guess I got sidetracked in that discussion about rounding off the corner.

Respectfully, I am trying to use my best English english. My buddy KENAT would appreciate that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor