My apologies. API 650 does not say "should be", those were my words. API 650 figure 5.19 includes an arrow pointing to the nozzle neck with the works "standard-weight line pipe" on the other end of the arrow. There is no corresponding text in the body of the standard. That said, in my opinion, using thicker pipe would not be a violation of the standard.
To quote the Foreward of the standard: "The design rules given in this Standard are minimum requirements. More stringent design rules specified by the Purchaser or furnished by the Manufacturer are acceptable when mutually agreed upon by the Purchaser and the Manufacturer. This Standard is not to be interpreted as approving, recommending, or endorsing any specific design or as limiting the method of design or construction"