Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

69kV and 138kV portable cables

Status
Not open for further replies.

jacob13

Electrical
Nov 11, 2005
8
We are looking to purchase 69kV or 138kV portable cables for our mobile transformer and use the cables of other temporary system needs. Currently, we are developing an equipment specification and would like to know if there are any major differences in physical properties that portable cables may have to regular permanent UG cables. Does anyone have any experience to specify and order 69 and 138kV portable(AKA temporary, emergency) cables?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Cables for portable equipment are generally more ruggedly constructed than cable intended for permanent installation. You should use cable that's intended for that purpose if possible.

Alan
“The engineer's first problem in any design situation is to discover what the problem really is.” Unk.
 
Flexibility should be a consideration. I would think that compressed conductors would be less flexible than uncompressed, but I have nothing to back this up. Insulation cost will be lower for compressed conductor. EPR is more flexible that XLPE, but has higher dielectric losses.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor