JoshPE
Structural
- Dec 15, 2019
- 1
Hello,
I work in the residential solar field and complete structural analysis reports for solar projects. I've noticed an issue with jurisdictions that have began to adopt the 2018 IBC. I will submit my calculations using ASCE 7-16, which utilizes the new "Basic" wind speeds that tend to be lower than the older Vult wind speeds. Many jurisdictions will kick back these calculations and state that they require a higher wind speed, which is essentially the Vult wind speed that is still referenced in the 2018 IRC. Does anyone have any explanation for this? I'm not sure why the 2018 IRC references different wind speeds than the 2018 IBC. I've had the same issue with jurisdictions in NV, AZ, and CO so far. I'm wondering if I'm missing something or if it's just going to take time for jurisdictions to get on the same page.
Thanks for the help!
Josh
I work in the residential solar field and complete structural analysis reports for solar projects. I've noticed an issue with jurisdictions that have began to adopt the 2018 IBC. I will submit my calculations using ASCE 7-16, which utilizes the new "Basic" wind speeds that tend to be lower than the older Vult wind speeds. Many jurisdictions will kick back these calculations and state that they require a higher wind speed, which is essentially the Vult wind speed that is still referenced in the 2018 IRC. Does anyone have any explanation for this? I'm not sure why the 2018 IRC references different wind speeds than the 2018 IBC. I've had the same issue with jurisdictions in NV, AZ, and CO so far. I'm wondering if I'm missing something or if it's just going to take time for jurisdictions to get on the same page.
Thanks for the help!
Josh