Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IRstuff on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  • Users: jpp06
  • Order by date
  1. jpp06

    ASCE 7-10 Simplified Envelope Method

    The intent of my original question was to find out why the Kz value was not being used with the simplified envelope method. If I had a spreadsheet to go by it would probably help answer my question. I understand what, why and how the "importance factor" was used in ASCE 7-05. I understand...
  2. jpp06

    ASCE 7-10 Simplified Envelope Method

    but it is not an importance factor. it is now a risk category. there is no importance factor anymore
  3. jpp06

    ASCE 7-10 Simplified Envelope Method

    actually sq.rt. of 0.6 if going from an ultimate wind speed to a wind speed used in allowable stress design. I am just puzzled as how you can use information from a map that assumes 1 set of criteria to navigate a table that assumes a completely different set of criteria.
  4. jpp06

    ASCE 7-10 Simplified Envelope Method

    That's what I ultimately did. I applied a load factor of 0.6 and achieved the pressures I was expecting. If you look at figure 28.6-1 (cont.) it clearly says that the tables assume an I = 1.0. But you are correct, there is no importance factor anymore... only risk categories. This was one of...
  5. jpp06

    ASCE 7-10 Simplified Envelope Method

    I agree, simplified = conservative. A 10-20 psf higher pressure seems too conservative to me. Here is what puzzles me - The simplified method utilizes tables based on a height of 30 feet and a wind design category B and an Importance factor of 1. The wind speed maps it tells us to reference...
  6. jpp06

    ASCE 7-10 Simplified Envelope Method

    I used lambda and my topographical coeff was 1... my pressures are still a great deal higher than when I use the calculated envelope method.
  7. jpp06

    ASCE 7-10 Simplified Envelope Method

    Can someone explain to me why the simplified method does not use the Kz, velocity pressure exposure coefficient? I am getting much higher pressures using the simplified envelope method. Thanks

Part and Inventory Search