Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  1. nongamer12

    horizontal lifeline - lanyard constant

    this thread has gotten a bit off topic from my original posted question. thanks for all input so far, but i'll try to get it back on track yet again: if one has experience accounting for a shock-absorbing lanyard on a cable horizontal lifeline design utilizing an energy approach, please post...
  2. nongamer12

    horizontal lifeline - lanyard constant

    i'm looking to design the system by balancing the energy equations. jstephen: yes, it's a stitch-rip system, but i'm just looking to ultimately include the energy the shock absorbing lanyard puts into the system, so i was idealizing the lanyard as a spring as it elongates. teguci: using a...
  3. nongamer12

    horizontal lifeline - lanyard constant

    I am currently designing a horizontal lifeline (HLL). Engineering Journal (2nd quarter, 2016) recently presented a paper by Thomas S. Dranger called "Design of Horizontal Life Lines in Personal Fall Arrest Systems". I'm comparing my previous HLL designs with this paper and am looking to...
  4. nongamer12

    composite beam designation

    thanks for the answers guys, sounds like i'm free to do whatever BS i like!
  5. nongamer12

    composite beam designation

    sorry for the silly question, but i was wondering if there was a standard way to designate composite steel beams with multiple rows of shear studs. right now i have something like: W18x40 (2@15) [c=1"]. it's the "2@15" that i'm wondering about. i don't assume it's a huge deal, but if there...
  6. nongamer12

    older concrete beam, bent bars

    thanks for all the replies helping me to verify the 7-#10 in the bottom at mid-span. the #2 @ 12" ties is just stated in the schedule; there is no beam elevation to show these pieces.
  7. nongamer12

    older concrete beam, bent bars

    there is a bend diagram, showing the bend location near the supports. i'm assuming 40 ksi steel. i just was wondering about whether those "bent bars" were in addition to the bottom bars, or if the "bent bars" were the number of bottom bars to be bent near the supports.
  8. nongamer12

    Fundamental question about column design

    it depends on where the columns are braced against buckling. if you have multiple levels of mezzanine floor framing, you're probably able to say the columns are braced at those levels. it's not just a matter of how it's put into the analysis software, it's a matter of conecptual...
  9. nongamer12

    older concrete beam, bent bars

    i'm working on a portion of an existing concrete building from 1962. i have access to the original drawings. a concrete beam reinforcing schedule has columns for: top bars, bottom bars, bent bars, stirrup marks, and ties. we're adding some load to a specific concrete beam. the beam is...
  10. nongamer12

    Flexural Reinforcement Termination in Stem of Retaining Wall

    you state that you're splicing the reinforcement. ACI 318-05 section 12.10.5 deals with terminating bars when they're no longer needed for strength. in my opinion, you're not terminating the reinforcing and don't need to satisfy 12.10.5.
  11. nongamer12

    concrete deep beam question

    does the horizontal face/skin reinforcing of a concrete deep beam need to be hooked into the column supports for development? thanks for any help/thoughts; let me know if you need more information.
  12. nongamer12

    IBC 2006 Equation 18-3

    Thanks so far everyone. I too wrote an excel program to do it for me. Now my question is about Equation 18-1, and specifically "d" and "S1" within. "d" is limited to 12' for purpose of computing lateral pressure. "S1" is the allowable lateral bearing pressure at 1/3 of the depth "d"...
  13. nongamer12

    IBC 2006 Equation 18-3

    Sorry for the simple question, but you need a break every once in a while... Equation 18-3 of the 2006 IBC is: d^2=4.25*(Mg/(S3*b)) Is S3 evaluated at a trial depth "d", so that it's an iterative solution? I'm just making sure. Thanks in advance for the reassurance.
  14. nongamer12

    aluminum slenderness - 1997 UBC

    I am evaluating an aluminum truss canopy that was built based on the 1997 UBC. I know member sizes and aluminum grade, but am having trouble evaluating the allowable compressive stress. The aluminum is 6063-T5, and I was using the welded aluminum properties. I'm using Table 20-I-C and...

Part and Inventory Search