Search results for query: *

TGS4: Where can I verify if the request 16-1607 has been answered? Thanks you Regards, Arnoldo Garcia

bpv66, thank you for your reply. Personally I also believe that the efficiency shall be the same using either RT or UT. Best Regards, Arnoldo G.

TGS4. I already request the interpretation to ASME and I received an email with the request no is 16-1622.

TGS4 - Thank you for your answer, I got your point. I will submit the Interpretation Request. Regards

Thanks to all of you for your replies. I understand that in my case, the use of UT is under the AI approbation, because the ASME code is not complete clear and is an interpretation issue. Regards, Arnoldo G.

More information about my case: The reactors we design are so big, and allays we consider 100%RT examination in order to reduce the thickness of the plates. But the time to examine all the joints is long and this is the reason we want to use UT (Phased array) in lieu of RT. But again...Which is...

I want to ask for help for interpretation of the next situation. In a reactor designed by ASME code Section VIII Div 1, Ed 2015, I want to apply 100% UT in lieu of 100% RT as per paragraph UW-51 (4). But in the table UW-12 of joint efficiences, it says that apply only for % of Radiographic...

Hi, We have a 6000psi hydraulic system, and i want to know what is the best crimp system of hydraulic hoses. And i want to know what is the maximun large of hoses in a hydraulic system. Thank you in advance.

Hi I'm new on this forum. I have a question. We have a Hydraulic Press, and the cricuits handle 6000 psi of pressure, we have installed square flange of 6000 psi of rate. But there is a lot o lake, the o-ring were damaged. What kind of flange we must install?. Thank you in advance. Best regards.