See attached article from Structure Magazine July 2008. The authors recommend R=2.5 for conveyors.http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=a6eed13a-4bb2-4c1a-a8e6-18abebb89422&file=Nonstructural_Component_or_Nonbuilding_Structure.pdf
I don't know the origin but I am currently working on an industrial project where we had a stair problem. We are replacing an existing stair in-kind that has a rise of 16 feet. The client made us follow the IBC code which involved re-design and re-detailing. I agrued that IBC is basically for...
Don't forget your steel manual like I did. Five minutes before the test I realized I did not have it. Broke out in a big sweat. Should have just gone to the airport and went home.
Passed it the second time.
The major difference between AISC and ASME is bearing strength.
AISC 1.8FyApb/omega = 32.4k
ASME 0.63Fy(Dpin)t/SF = 7.56k w/SF=3.0
I have the Ricker article.
Thanks to all
I'm curious as to how others design lifting lugs. I am using AISC D.5 and J.7. The lug I am designing appears to be governed by bearing strength using AISC Eq J7-1 Rn = 1.8FyApb. But I also found reference to ASME-BTH-1-2008 Eq 3-54 where the bearing capacity is P=0.63Fy(Dpin)t which is a big...
Thanks for everyone's input. I felt that I was being too conservative. For my particular situation I am concerned about the overstress in the anchor bolts and I do not know any detail about embedment, they might even be hook bolts. The client is OK with dropping columns to the right to...
Thanks for everyone's input. It's been a long time since I worked on a job with a frost depth this deep. We typically are in the 3 foot range, so it's not a big deal to make all foundations the same depth.
We are designing an industrial facility in Canada with a 7 foot frost depth. The facility has a lot of interior equipment foundations. If the facility is heated do these foundations also have to go to the frost depth?
The stress ratio on the column is 1.5, rafter 1.25. I can reinforce them but the anchor bolts are going to be the biggest problem. I might be better off trying to drop another post at the end of the rafter on the right side. This probably would eliminate overstress in the column and anchor bolts.
I am designing a fall protection system for an existing (1960's) truck loading station at a chemical plant (see attached sketch). A person will be walking ontop of a tanker truck attached to an overhead monorail system. I am designing this for the OSHA 5000# requirement as a static force...
I don't quite see where the pullout capacity of the sleeve is a concern. If you are using a headed bolt the head should be far enough below the sleeve such that the pullout cone is not affected by the sleeve.
We use sleeves a lot for setting equipment and this has never been a concern.
Another thing you might want to consider is that if there is un-used space on the rack, someone is going to use it in the future. For gravity loads I might factor the loads up depending on how much un-used space there is on the rack.
I am missing pages 65.2 & 65.3 from 2004 ASME II Part D. I am looking for S at elevated temp for SA-240 316L. I would really appreciate it if someone could either provide the values or provide the missing pages.
Thanks