I see from Case 2695, this it is just for "part 4 div 2" and apply for the RULES application in that division,
nothing from the design by stress analysis approach "part 5 in div 2".
therefore from U-2(g) you just need to satisfy the inspector that the design is properly done.
but still I cannot...
Is there any "statement" in ASME VIII div 1, that link div 1 with div 2?.
Take as example a casting Y type strainer design by "DIV 1 - concepts" (even knowing that such component is not cover by div1"), is there any "alternative design route" in asme div 1 that link with div 2 (therefore I will...
Prex:
The term:
“gradient through plate thickness” mean bending across the thickness?...
So for a thick wall vessel (Rm/t = 1.34) the bending stress across the wall away from discontinuities (so we are in the shell), the bending due to internal pressure only is classified as secondary stress Q...
A got a thick “Tee” component under internal pressure only, I would like to know how to classify the stress in a section where no influence of the of the gross geometrical discontinuity (the junction bend of the tee) is affecting the stress at the point where I am evaluating the stress...
I would like to know how peaktop makes his calculations to get the values of the table..
peaktop please if you can send one of yours calcualtion I will check it, I am wondering how he or she do his cals.
Thanks.
just to make it clear ( I did a copy paste from world):
so it did not take the exponent in the equations:
Tau = (2.4 - lbar)^phi .... eq 1
phi= 0.25 + (0.535 (lbar)^8)/(0.05+(lbar)^7) .... eq 2
solving for l/dh = 1 so lbar = 1:
phi= 0.25 + (0.535 (lbar)^8/(0.05+(lbar)^7)=...
Here a copy of Diagram 8-3 from Ildechik 3th edition.
What is right: the table or the ecuation?.
The equation for tau does not works if you check with the table given.
As example let take l/dh = 1 so lbar = 1
Table stand: tau = 0.24
From equation
Tau = (2.4 - lbar) phi
Where phi= 0.25 +...
Thanks.
I knew already about this page, The best for elastomeres and plastic like materials if you want to perform FEA.
I just would like is to increase my data base in elastomers.
For those how has data and want to calculate the constants for different models:
http://www.hyperfit.wz.cz/
Well, If your pressure load produce a deflection less than half of the thickness, a lineal assumption is Ok.
and as mark said:"My panel will be all the time in the elastic region", so a lineal analysis will be valid.
if you got the option of large deformation in your software, will be usseful...
Hello every body.
I believe this is a typical FEA study case, and the interpretation of boundary conditions are critical even if it seen to be a simple problem.
I agree with gwolf2, you can find some information about strength calculation for perforated sheet metal on...
well, in wildfire 4 I know that support for hyper-elastic models (ruber, plastic materials) were ADDED, so you can perform lineal analysis with large elastic deformation on ruber materials.
Know, from John Buchowski (Director Simulation Products
PTC Product Management) I got the answer:
"I...
Basiclly. Div 1 is a "concervative way to design" a pressure vessel based by rule (following equations).
Div 2, is a alternative way to design a pressure vessel, in a more "Economical" point of view; regarding with the requeried material thickness: you will get less material thickness, but the...
I will say the best are CFDedign, have a look on:
www.cfdesign.com
or you can contact
optima-design in UK
(www.optima-design.co.uk)..David Ried..is the one.
napoleon.
regards.
all the manual and user guide is on here:
http://simba.ara.bme.hu/~cfd/fluent6.1doc/help/.
(if ir doesn't works...go to yahoo.com and put:
"fluent 6.1 user guide"
and go to the http with .hu and here you will find it.
regards.
Remember that a state of stress is a complex organization of normal and shears stress matrix, so talking about principal or von misses stress is a way to see a specifically a state of stress, I mean: Von Misses is a combination of principal and shear stress view as a scalar (magnitude) perhaps...