Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Register Log in
  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  • Users: PRTG
  • Order by date
  1. PRTG

    ASME VIII Div1 UG-45(b)(4): Is it a trick to use standard?

    Thanks deanc but, unfortunately, I haven't at my disposal Interpretations before 07/01 (Vol. 48).
  2. PRTG

    ASME VIII Div1 UG-45(b)(4): Is it a trick to use standard?

    According to the description in UG-45, it seems that there's no possibility of using ANSI/ASME B36-10 lower than schedule Standard (when vessel is under medium pressure, so as that UG-45 (b) (1) to (3) don't apply). It's no easy to accept it when minium wall thikness by UG-45(a) is very much...
  3. PRTG

    Is it possible to avoid radiographic examination using AD-Merblatter ?

    I'd like to justified calculus of a pressure vessel using german design code AD-Merkblatter and I don't want to make non-destructively test. It is permited in ASME VIII by using a efficient joint of 0,7. The same is stated in European Directive 97/23/CE. My question, if anyone is familiar to...

Part and Inventory Search

Back
Top Bottom