Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  1. Assumptions

    Excel - Solver - Macro

    Would appreciate some help on the following: Creating a Macro that uses the Excel "Solver" function. When I run the Macro it returns with a notice "Compile error: Sub or Function not defined." It highlights "SolverOK" in the code. If someone could sugest a solution it would be appreciated...
  2. Assumptions

    Restriction Orifice

    Have a look at the Yarway valves. They were made for these application. If you use an RO on its own for min flow, you will have to add this flow rate into your requirements for your process design flow rate. http://www.yarway.com/control_valves.asp
  3. Assumptions

    Controlling pump pressure

    AS you wish to maintain a 50 PSI drop across the particular system the best approach is to use a feedback loop and measure that D/P. Thus a D/P transmitter across the system or two pressure transmitters. It would appear that the system has a fixed resistance and by maintaing the 50 PSI drop one...
  4. Assumptions

    Sizing a pump with a elevation in the discharge line.

    One should draw a diagram for the system. In the best case, once the line is filled the lowest pressure that could be achieved at the top of the hill is zero PSIA. That would be equivalent to 33.9 ft of water at 4C at sea level. Since it appears that you have a heavier fluid the head in feet of...
  5. Assumptions

    Friction factor correlation/dimensionless quantity?

    See "Chemical Engineering Fluid Mechanics", by Ron Darby. In the second ed., it is explained on page 218, Unknown Diameter. However, no name is given to the dimensionless number. Although, it remains a trial and error approach.
  6. Assumptions

    Sizing of orifice?

    Orifice Sizing I used the method given in Flow Measurement Engineering Handbook in Chapter 13.(Third Edition). My values differ by the difference in the discharge coefficient that have been used. The method is for a plate with d<thickness<6d. The fly in the ointment for me is the assumption...
  7. Assumptions

    PSV sizing for vapor-liquid mixtures

    The September 2005 issue of Che has a good article on the topic, Size Safety-Relief Valves for Any Condition. http://www.che.com/
  8. Assumptions

    Relief valve opening

    I would suggest that the "relief" valve is operating correctly and that perhaps the air supply system is set too high for the downstream service. If it is a case where the normal operation is lifting the safety valve then the upstream conditions should be changed to prevent the overpressuring...
  9. Assumptions

    accuracy and error measurement

    Just to add a bit. Richard W. Miller's book "Flow Measurement Engineering Handbook" discusses this in chapter four, titled Accuracy. One way that I thought about this, is in addition to the normal errors as covered in the above methods, is to do a calculation for the additional error from the...
  10. Assumptions

    accuracy and error measurement

    The max possible error for each device is addded together as an absolute value. Thus your orifice, flow transmitter and recording device are all added together. This will give you the max possible error when conditions are as per the orifice calculations. Depending on the P & T calculations that...
  11. Assumptions

    Vapor Space Flammability concentration

    Here is an MSDS for your substituted benzine derivative. http://physchem.ox.ac.uk/MSDS/XY/o-xylene.html Having been involved in a BTX plant years ago, I am surprised that these things are still connected to the atmosphere.
  12. Assumptions

    Friction Factor for Extremely Low Renyolds Num.

    No. Your method is correct. I do not get the same Re in your calculation.(Assuming the flow was in GPM) For your own calcs write down the inputs and stay with those same values throughout. I am not checking all simple calcs. I have been working from your inputs. In a few years from now if...
  13. Assumptions

    Friction Factor for Extremely Low Renyolds Num.

    OK I checked the Crane reference. Your value for K contains an error for "d". You repeated the error for "d" in the calculation for delta P. Hope that this helps a bit.(My comments pertain only to delta P calcs.) Aparently you have changed to 1/2". If 1/2" is used Re changes and just by chance...
  14. Assumptions

    Friction Factor for Extremely Low Renyolds Num.

    OK I get the same Re and the same f However, I do not get the same delta P. I looked in Crane and could not find the equation that you have used for your delta P calc.(0.1PSI) Or list the reference for your delta P calculation.
  15. Assumptions

    Friction Factor for Extremely Low Renyolds Num.

    RJB32482 Your units for flow rate are mixed up. Your origional post has 0.8 GPH Your last calculation has 0.35GPH for the Re calculation. Your delta P calculation has 0.35 GPM. A good way of checking things is to make sure that the units come out correctly. Otherwise you might not be off by...
  16. Assumptions

    Friction Factor for Extremely Low Renyolds Num.

    I believe that your flow rate given in the equation is different than that in your initial listing.
  17. Assumptions

    Friction Factor for Extremely Low Renyolds Num.

    From a practical standpoint I would say yes, because it will not result in a large pressure drop. However, the plots of f vs Re that I have seen normally end around Re = 100. So you Darcy-Weisbach f would be correct. Just a further note, I obtain a Re of about 0.1 for your conditions, assuming...
  18. Assumptions

    How to connect an Air Exchanger to my ducts

    Just happened upon this post and have to comment. I have no expertise nor experience in HVAC other than living in a cold climate. Looking at the pictures and reading the comments it has not been stated whether there is a fresh air intake for combustion. If not there shoud be one for safety. It...
  19. Assumptions

    Pressure difference of control valve

    As always language has a huge effect on things. I don't know the full background on how the language for control valves has developed but my two cents on the wording for this is, that it is at the least confusing. Perhaps a better definination for max allowable dP would be max effective dP. In...
  20. Assumptions

    Friction Loss Books

    One that I am using at present is "Chemical Engineering Fluid Mechanics", Second Edition by Ron Darby. Another one, which I have only scanned through and followed some examples is "Slurry Systems Handbook" McGraw Hill. Depending on the case they require knowing the limits and possible range...

Part and Inventory Search