Search results for query: *

thanks anyway Sr. Pro/E Mechnaical Designer

i'm just try to get a feeling for the syntax only not wheather there is such an object. lets try this: DIN912_M3X0.5X25.4L SHCS, ALLOY STEEL Sr. Pro/E Mechnaical Designer

maybe i wasn't clear enough..sorry the CAD part file name is: DIN912_M3X1_5X8L correction to orginal post...can't have a period in a file name and the description is: SHCS, ALLOY STEEL PLATED does this help a little? Sr. Pro/E Mechnaical Designer

i'm still working on our "mil-spec" metric hardware library so forgive me if it sounds as if i'm beating a dead horse... is this syntax acceptable for a metric callout in a BOM? DIN912_M3X1.5X8L SHCS, ALLOY STEEL PLATED i'm trying to mimic the US mil spec syntax call out, i.e. MS16995-1 SHCS...

ok. thanks for all of your inputs. Sr. Pro/E Mechnaical Designer

here's a PDF to show my scheme Sr. Pro/E Mechnaical Designerhttp://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=48423cd7-8ed6-42fd-9f90-d4891ff81d79&file=011038.pdf

no, just standard dimensions +-.005 Sr. Pro/E Mechnaical Designer

it's 2 holes dimensioned from a common edge is the way i did it. he claims that using a base line (ordinate) dimension scheme has a greater tolerance stack than if one hole is dimensioned to an edge and the other hole is dimensioned to that hole Sr. Pro/E Mechnaical Designer

i'm getting redlined on my dimensiioning scheme. i have always tried to dimension from a common edge (datum)and not use chain dimensions. the standard says that chain dimensions have the most tolerance stack while baseline/ordinate and direct dimensioning schemes have lesser tolerance stacks...

thanks for the reply's. CM = configuration mgmnt CM said they need the dimensional info in the description so purchasing knows what to get. i believe the drawing should be the control for what purchasing needs to do any purchasing. BTW the part in question is a square heatsinking material which...

our CM dept is insisting that a dimensional value be included in a part description. i don't think that's correct in that if the part changes physically (size change) the description of the part (embedded dimension) no longer matches the physical dimensions of the part. is there a spec (possible...

thanks for the links. that's what i was looking for :-) Sr. Pro/E Mechnaical Designer

i'm trying to develop a CAD library of metric "mil spec" hardware. I've found out that there isn't a mil spec for metric hardware...SHCS, FHCS, washers, nuts, hex bolts etc.is there a spec for this type of application, either ISO or DIN and where can i find such. the specs that i've found are...

posted in the ISO group as well i'm trying to develop a CAD library of metric "mil spec" hardware. I’ve found out that there isn't a mil spec for metric hardware...SHCS, FHCS, washers, nuts, hex bolts etc. is there a spec for this type of application, either ISO or DIN and where can i find...

thanks but i've developed the table myself Sr. Pro/E Mechnaical Designer

anyone out there in pro/e land have a drawing table that's been set up for a family tabled part that they would like to share? i have one but i can't resize 2 of the columns. thanks in advance Sr. Pro/E Mechnaical Designer

thanx for all the info on mil spec connector spacing question. that's exactly what i was looking for :-) Sr. Pro/E Mechnaical Designer

does anyone out there know what the MIL-SPEC is for a thru wall mil spec connector spacing arrangement? i believe there is a spec that calls out the distance btwn connectors (relative to their size) in regards to being able to get a persons hand (gloved/not gloved) into an area to disconnect it...

ok. thanks for all the help. this site is a great source for info that's hard to find anywhere. this info is based upon a LOT of experience from a lot of individuals in many different engineering fields. thanks again Sr. Pro/E Mechnaical Designer

what i was most concerned about was top level and sub-assenbly drawings calling out english mil-spec AND ISO spec hardware. Sr. Pro/E Mechnaical Designer