Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IRstuff on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  • Users: nachocivicos
  • Content: Threads
  • Order by date
  1. nachocivicos

    Self-energizing O rings

    Hi, In case of Self-energizing O-rings, strante behaviour appears when comparing integral and loose type flanges (ASME VIII, Div.1, Mandatory App. 2), calculated thickness for loose-type (sketch 4a) appear to be lower than for integral-type (sketch 7). How is it possible? I believed thickness...
  2. nachocivicos

    INTEGRAL VS. LOOSE FLANGES CALCULATION

    Hi, Regarding flange calculations according to ASME Section VIII Div. 1 Mandatory Appendix 2, the paragraph 2-7 seems quite obscure to me; loose or integral-type formulas appear to be "interchangeable" to some degree provided a hub "is considered" or not (?). I would appreciate very much some...
  3. nachocivicos

    CROSSED LINK BETWEEN UG-36 AND UG-39?

    Hi, In case of openings in flat heads, I am not fully sure of the logic linking UG-36 and UG-39 in ASME VIII Div. 1. As a first "general" appearance in the "OPENINGS AND REINFORCEMENTS" subject, one could think that openings meeting UG-36 requirements do not need to be further checked for...
  4. nachocivicos

    Variable section opening

    Hi, I have to design a variable section opening in a flat head; it begins with 32 mm diameter inwards, follows with a conical enlargement and ends with a BSP female thread 1 1/2", but I have not found any reference in ASME Sec. VIII Div. 1 to variable section openings. Any other similar...

Part and Inventory Search