Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations TugboatEng on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
-
Engineering designation of critical parts
Context - I am in a growing startup design/manufacturing environment. No Production Cert. Note: we do fixed wing airplanes, not rotorcraft - an important distinction because of 27.602/29.602. Currently our engineering drawings & process specs do not explicitly identify critical parts, nor do...- Ng2020
- Thread
- Replies: 9
- Forum: Aircraft engineering
-
Model organisation, version control
I am working with an airplane internal loads model. The configuration of the wing, fuselage, landing gear etc will change as the project develops, so we want to be able to version control each major subassembly independently. For example: Airplane Configuration XYZ = Wing version 1.3 + Fuselage...- Ng2020
- Thread
- Replies: 12
- Forum: Siemens: Femap
-
HL12 hiloks
I have been looking at hilok/hitigue usage across a number of different OEMs. Regarding the basic Ti hiloks HL10,11,& 12, , I noticed that while HL10 is called out by several OEMs in shear applications, its equivalent tension head, the HL12, is not in common usage for tension applications Is...- Ng2020
- Thread
- Replies: 4
- Forum: Aircraft engineering
-
23.613 and normalised 4130 bar stock
Issue: Allowables in MMPDS for 4130 bar stock in the normalised condition have no statiscal basis (Table 2.*.*.* g1), nor is a specification minimum stated in the various bar stock AMS and MIL specifications (only F condition is addressed - I'm guessing the reason for this absence is that 4130...- Ng2020
- Thread
- Replies: 20
- Forum: Aircraft engineering
