Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

Register Log in
  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  • Users: R4FKEN
  • Content: Threads
  • Order by date
  1. R4FKEN

    Searching for examples of non-conform Material Certificates

    Hi, Part of my job is to review material certificates, be it CMTR's, MTR's, EN10204 3.1's, 3.2's, etc. Me and my colleagues know plenty of horror stories about fraudulent certificates, but getting an actual copy of the faulty paperwork is difficult. A search online didn't result in much. My...
  2. R4FKEN

    RCC-M : RMC 2410

    RMC 2410 states that only straight probes are allowed for UT of thicknesses over 60 mm. A colleague of mine is convinced that this implicates the plates have to be scanned from both surfaces, because of the dead zone of straight probes. It's impossible for me to change his mind: i believe this...
  3. R4FKEN

    RCC-M : RMC 2410

    RMC 2410 states that only straight probes are allowed for UT of thicknesses over 60 mm. A colleague of mine is convinced that this implicates the plates have to be scanned from both surfaces, because of the dead zone of straight probes. It's impossible for me to change his mind: i believe this...
  4. R4FKEN

    EN 10204 certificate 3.1 ?

    Hi, I have a supplier delivering a rough forging with a 3.1 certificate. However, only chemical analysis has been performed; for mechanical values the certificate only mentions the min/max values. EN10204 isn't 100% clear on what is obligatory to include in a 3.1. Is this supplier allowed to...

Part and Inventory Search

Back
Top