hello everyone
I know there are already many threads about CBR and DCP, but I didn't find a satisfactory answer
is the existing correlation between CBR and DCP are :
a- field dcp on natural soil and soaked lab cbr on compacted sample (ASTM d1883)?
b- field dcp on compacted soil and soaked lab...
hi
what's the risk of using soil sample in more than one test ? like re-compacting a sample that already undergo CBR test and testing it again with different density or using a tested unsoaked CBR specimen for soaked test ?
does CBR test or proctor test crush's soil particles ?
hello everyone
i know this is a repeated question but i did not find a good answer , is there a correlation between in-situ cbr and lab cbr , because i'm trying to relate DCP TO CBR for a specific type of soil [ponder]
hello
what is the purpose of using a filter paper in cbr test and is it correct to use the modified proctor molds (152 mm dia 115 mm height ) for cbr without a spacer disk since it gives same sample volume ?
hello
what parameters do you suggest to correlate with dcp considering gypseous soil aside from cbr ?
is it a good idea to correlate with bearing capacity ?
and is it safe to say field cbr twice lab. cbr value ? i read that somewhere .
