B&K produce an excellent series of manuals and technical notes on signal analysis in general and vibration monitoring. The HP/Agilent intro is also fine...
In theory it doesn't matter where the trial weights are located on each plane relative to the other plane, I think. But i haven't done this in a long time(25 years). I'd have thought so long as all measurements and locations were referenced to a single shaft reference marker it would be OK.
You do the 2 single plane balances by record the vibration or velocity at both planes. Same number of runs just more data.
Maths is here https://www.eng-tips.com/threads/diy-crankshaft-balancing-with-an-oscilloscope.511892/#post-8933361
Frankly I'd be calling in a large motor balancing guy.
Did you 2 plane balance? Since automotive crankshafts are oil bearings I don't remember any problems balancing them.
Depending on the natural frequencies of the rotor you may be operating above the whirl speed. Certainly possible...
If you are messing about with running close to or above the natural frequency (here there be dragons, but it is common with big turbines) then the other thing to watch for is half speed whirl.
Yes the first critical speed of the shaft is the first bending mode of the non rotating shaft.
Am I right in thinking that gyroscopic and centrifugal forces seem to influence the lateral natural frequencies of the shaft in the rotating reference, as they essentially provide a "stiffening"...
I have seen successful estimates of stick slip problems, you need to know the axial and radial compliance of the blocks and of course the coefficients of friction, as well as all the other obvious properties of the system
Shrugs. Without details of the payload, geometry of the tubes etc then it's all going to be handwavium but at a guess you have a non linear kitchen drawer sticking type problem if you only have one set of acetal blocks. 92 Hz is irrelevant.
Knock sensors work 5-10 kHz, they are detecting high frequency modes in the cylinder head. Finding where to put them is a bit of a project on an automotive engine because we are cheap and only want to use one sensor to detect knock in all the cylinders. Since you've got single cylinder heads you...
If you are confident with the timing you can use a gated time window to get rid of the noise. That is you zero out everything but the few degrees of crank sensor around that event.
et voila
https://www.bkvibro.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/BAN0062EN11_MS_Gated_vibrations_recips.pdf
You might find an accelerometer on the head is more useful. It's a tricky project, all those events are at the same fundamental frequency, they'll just have different phases and harmonics. A stethoscope or a screwdriver might be a good place to start.
Here's the guts of it everything else is just eye candy
%build some matrices
K=[k1+k2 -k2;-k2 k2];
M=[m1 0;0 m2];
M_baseline=[m1 0;0 0]; %baseline case, ie main mass only
C=[c1+c2 -c2;-c2 c2];
F=[1;0];%excite the main mass, ie engine case
%runs happier
x1=zeros(1000,1);
x2=zeros(1000,1)...
Your calculator has an error in it. If you set m2 to a very small value the TL should be the same as the 1dof system. Where is the force being applied, ie do you have a subframe (m2 is excited) or a conventional harmonic damper (M1 is excited)?
Ah, yes I thought the thickness was a bit exotic. Sorry, i literally have no idea how to spec an electromagnet for that job. It rather depends on what you need it to do.
1689 rpm is 28.15 Hz. You may have some 2nd order at twice that
Something doesn't add up, you'd expect to see at least some content at tooth mesh frequency.