That is fine for component and caldding but it appears they have not addressed the change to MWFRS which I why I said to leave footnote f and say 0.6W in column heading so both component and cladding and MWFRS forces are scaled down to ASD level.
I am designing to 2012 IBC for the first time (solar carport) and notice that the wind deflection limits in table 1604.3 remain unchanged.
But wind has changed to a strength level load so these deflection limits are now more restrictive.
I think this is a mistake and instead of "W" they should...