It's due to how the calculation approximations work (very soft springs at each node) associated with the Non-iterative Based on Mass P-Delta option.
Suggest adopting the proper iterative P-Delta setting .
The summary is a different set of loads to the original screenshot.
Anyway this pier isn't failing in flexure anymore but the boundary elements seem to be going over the limit (0.20*Fck). The pier is running at around 3MPa shear, which is quite high.
I suggest reading up on the backstay...
Need more information... What's the pier size? strength? expected rebar?
But looking at your loads - you've got tension and major axis bending. Plotting the interaction diagram, your bending capacity is hindered once the section goes into tension. Your pier is also failing in shear.
Also, the...
I have only recently started to investigate the Energy/Virtual Work Diagrams feature within ETABS.
I'm curious how many others are using it to assess lateral stability systems?
Few initial thoughts:
- Would there be any benefit if CSI broke down each degree of freedom (ie axial deformation...
You can automesh shells and apply non-linear compression springs in ETABS. View the bearing pressure plots under Display > Force/Stress Diagrams > Soil Pressure...
I'm fairly sure slab design (strip based approach) is included in the standard version (not Ultimate) of ETABS these days.
It might be worth posing a similar question to the Earth Retention sub-forum. There may be more suitable 3D FEA software.
CSI are slowly phasing all SAFE features into ETABS to create the one-stop shop. At present, I think you can achieve everything you mention above within ETABS.
In regards...
What a terribly vague question, but I'm going to take a stab in the dark and guess that the speaker was referring to uniformly reinforced shear walls (ETABS default?) vs clustered end reinforced shear walls.
You could make the argument uniformly reinforced walls are not as efficient, because...